Top-rated Albums on MA  

Home

All data from THE Metal Archives. Web page genereated with R.

This page is about the so called top rated or highest reviewed albums by the MA users. They are really way too famous (and too mainstream for my taste) to make them a list. But anyway.

TL;DR. Go to the list.

Trying to find the most favored album, I scraped 50000+ review pages across the site and analyzed them with statistical methods. The result? well that depends on how you evaluate the data. Models with different weight may lead to entirely different conclusions. Also the extremely small sample size of the reviews on an individual album and the heavily skewed distributions of the ratings in general can be limiting factors when applying statistical techniques. So I tend not to offer ONE definite album name. But it's not Hades Archer's Penis Metal at least.

3 parts of work I've done:

- Fetching the data from the review pages, building a dataset and applying "comparing mean techniques" (pairwise Mann Whitney U Test principally) on the data in order to rank the reviewed albums and make a top list out of them (see the list at the bottom of the page).

- Word mining based on the top list dataset, which can be seen as a subset of all data I get, in order to see how the most popular albums have been reviewed exactly.

- Sampling the top list dataset further in order to visualize them.

But stuff I write here will not be confined to this order. The analysis details that I used to select and rank the albums will (possibly) be added later, if I can somehow motivate myself to write about that..

Start with a glance

The bubble chart shows how a random sample of reviewers (sample size = 2000) rate the albums through time. The plot sizes indicate the number of words in an individual review, while the colors differentiate the bands’ country of origin (European-red, American-black, Oceanian-beige, Asian-lila, in descending order of the number).

It seems the users really like to heap their reviews on the top. Even i tried so hard to adjust the parameters, the plots still overlap heavily. Understandable though. We might get more motivated to write a review about the albums we like than about stuff that we find generic after all.

Look into the reviews

Wanna know what they say exactly? Let’s do some simple word mining.

How many words are there in the dataset?

## [1] 1103297

That’s quite a few.

But how many unique words?

## [1] 20599

0.9998133% of all words are repeated..

How many if you exclude stuff like “a”, “the”, “and”, blabla?

That means to filter out prepositions, conjunctions, pronouns and articles.

## [1] 10161

What are the words they used frequently?

## # A tibble: 10,159 x 2
##    .       freq
##    <chr> <int>
##  1 metal  6796
##  2 like   6534
##  3 album  5342
##  4 more   4522
##  5 all    4126
##  6 sound  3765
##  7 well   3549
##  8 first  3048
##  9 best   2853
## 10 very   2830
## # ... with 10,149 more rows

Or even try filtering harder?

## # A tibble: 3,000 x 2
##    .         freq
##    <chr>   <int>
##  1 best     2853
##  2 heavy    1498
##  3 hard      894
##  4 perfect   738
##  5 thrash    663
##  6 dark      652
##  7 riff      697
##  8 vocal     630
##  9 classic   616
## 10 evil      480
## # ... with 2,990 more rows

Read some random words?

##   [1] "vodka"          "principal"      "clumsy"         "junkie"        
##   [5] "grass"          "dramatically"   "vitriolic"      "delivery"      
##   [9] "arsenal"        "traffic"        "pantheistic"    "genuine"       
##  [13] "roman"          "patrick"        "divergence"     "alma"          
##  [17] "undiscoverable" "stud"           "endeavor"       "peter"         
##  [21] "silver"         "kirk"           "ensemble"       "afterwards"    
##  [25] "dual"           "unexplainably"  "fission"        "thin"          
##  [29] "transom"        "gem"            "pocket"         "fantasy"       
##  [33] "cryptic"        "defiantly"      "deliberate"     "violin"        
##  [37] "advised"        "infancy"        "compassion"     "observant"     
##  [41] "anthony"        "suspect"        "eccentricity"   "pusillanimous" 
##  [45] "usurpation"     "dialogue"       "scene"          "commonly"      
##  [49] "delicacy"       "shortcoming"    "dogs"           "replay"        
##  [53] "som"            "female"         "scary"          "debut"         
##  [57] "liege"          "palisade"       "fittingly"      "clean"         
##  [61] "isolation"      "frigging"       "friday"         "light"         
##  [65] "queue"          "ira"            "elvis"          "headless"      
##  [69] "rapidly"        "maiden"         "inflated"       "bloodline"     
##  [73] "trusting"       "integration"    "nevermore"      "craft"         
##  [77] "headed"         "vulnerable"     "inheritance"    "catholicism"   
##  [81] "tony"           "analog"         "anguish"        "painted"       
##  [85] "outlier"        "funk"           "immaculate"     "stray"         
##  [89] "dennis"         "bloodshed"      "computer"       "exceedingly"   
##  [93] "rocky"          "averse"         "overabundance"  "hyperactive"   
##  [97] "climax"         "continually"    "orbit"          "closer"        
## [101] "unsurprising"   "celebrated"     "microphone"     "wrest"         
## [105] "unorthodox"     "willing"        "iced"           "mandarin"      
## [109] "clip"           "battlefield"    "reward"         "rome"          
## [113] "amon"           "global"         "eloquent"       "frankly"       
## [117] "analogy"        "rex"            "chillingly"     "inescapably"

Kirk? grass? vodka? Good words my fellow devil worshipers.

Show them in a picture

Frequency will be shown when hovering the word.

hmmm… not especially surprising.
(but if you look carefully into the tiny ones, you might find something interesting...)




Smth else about reviews

What’s the earliest date in the dataset?

## [1] "2002-07-14"

And what’s the lateset?

## [1] "2021-06-27"

How many words are there in one piece of review in general?

## [1] 3735.419

How many words are there in the shortest and the longest review respectively?

## [[1]]
## [1] 735
## 
## [[2]]
## [1] 31195

I think I’d check out that 31195-word-long review later.

Some other computing..

Who are the scene darlings?

Let’s see who have the most albums among, say, top 500.

## # A tibble: 486 x 2
##    Band         Album_n
##    <chr>          <int>
##  1 Black Sabbath     10
##  2 Bathory            9
##  3 Blind Guardian     9
##  4 Iron Maiden        8
##  5 Judas Priest       8
##  6 Amorphis           7
##  7 Death              7
##  8 Helloween          7
##  9 Moonsorrow         7
## 10 Neurosis           7
## # ... with 476 more rows

So Black Sabbath top the list with 10 albums. And Bathory, Blind Guardian…

What are the most beloved genres then?

## # A tibble: 291 x 2
##    Genre             Album_n
##    <chr>               <int>
##  1 Death Metal            52
##  2 Black Metal            37
##  3 Heavy Metal            32
##  4 Thrash Metal           32
##  5 Melodic Death Metal    18
##  6 Power/Speed Metal      15
##  7 Heavy/Doom Metal       13
##  8 Doom Metal             11
##  9 Progressive Metal      11
## 10 Power Metal            10
## # ... with 281 more rows

Death metal and black metal turn out to be our favorite. Since I just keep the "genre" as it is, you might notice "Death Metal" and "Melodic Death Metal" are counted as two genres here. It's safe to say the number will rise if I merge these subgenres like “Brutal”, “Post-”, “Atmospheric” and this or that or whatever, let alone there are quite a few bands whose genre are something like "Trve Black Metal (early); Folk/Dark Basement Ambient (mid); Extreme Experimental Punk/Disco (later)".

Which countries provided us most albums we like?

## # A tibble: 37 x 2
##    Country          per(%)
##    <chr>            <int>
##  1 United States     34.4
##  2 Sweden            10.6
##  3 United Kingdom    8.0
##  4 Norway            7.4
##  5 Germany           6.4
##  6 Finland           4.8
##  7 Canada            4.2
##  8 France            2.6
##  9 Australia         2.0
## 10 Switzerland       1.8
## # ... with 27 more rows

??? 34.4% Who would have thought!

What are the most “controversial” albums?

To examnie how the opinion diverges on a certain album, you should look at the the sd value (standard deviantion) of the ratings. “In statistics, the standard deviation is a measure of the amount of variation or dispersion of a set of values,” as Wikipedia puts it. “A low sd indicates that the values tend to be close to the the expected value of the set, while a high sd indicates that the values are spread out over a wider range” bla bla… Based on this concept, a high sd can probably be a sign of dissension within the reviewers, although the album they reviewed may have relatively high rating on average.

## # A tibble: 263 x 6
##    Band          Album               Reviewer Rating.mean Rating.sd Rating.range
##    <chr>         <chr>                  <int>       <dbl>     <dbl> <chr>       
##  1 Velvet Cacoon Genevieve                 17        81.9      29.7 0~100       
##  2 Death         The Sound of Perse~       29        77.2      29.4 3~100       
##  3 Agalloch      Marrow of the Spir~       17        80        29.2 17~100      
##  4 Gorguts       Obscura                   24        81        27.8 0~100       
##  5 Ihsahn        The Adversary             15        83.3      27.4 0~100       
##  6 Electric Wiz~ Dopethrone                17        81        27.2 0~100       
##  7 Metallica     Master of Puppets         38        80.3      27.0 0~100       
##  8 Wormed        Planisphærium             16        81.3      26.8 6~100       
##  9 Celtic Frost  Monotheist                23        85.6      26.0 5~100       
## 10 Opeth         Damnation                 17        83.5      25.7 19~100      
## # ... with 253 more rows

Rather surprising that Death’s The Sound of Perseverance pops up. The album has 29 reviewers whose ratings ranged from 3 to 100, with 29.418 being the sd of the rating values. Opinion really seems divided here.

What are the most “universially acclaimed” albums?

Same concept, measured contrarily.

## # A tibble: 263 x 6
##    Band        Album                 Reviewer Rating.mean Rating.sd Rating.range
##    <chr>       <chr>                    <int>       <dbl>     <dbl> <chr>       
##  1 Entombed    Left Hand Path              23        98.7      2.05 94~100      
##  2 King Diamo~ Abigail                     18        97.2      4.22 84~100      
##  3 Symphony X  The Divine Wings of ~       17        96.5      4.68 83~100      
##  4 W.A.S.P.    The Crimson Idol            16        96.4      6.23 75~100      
##  5 Terrorizer  World Downfall              15        96.3      7.22 73~100      
##  6 Rush        Moving Pictures             15        96.2      3.90 87~100      
##  7 Bathory     Under the Sign of th~       18        95.7      5.65 80~100      
##  8 Katatonia   Dance of December So~       22        95.5      7.15 72~100      
##  9 Type O Neg~ October Rust                15        95.3      7.23 78~100      
## 10 Atheist     Unquestionable Prese~       20        95.2      6.06 80~100      
## # ... with 253 more rows

23 reviewers of Entombed’s Left Hand Path were literally unanimous in their approval of the album, settling their ratings at around 98 out of 100. I’ve added the album to my to-revisit-list actually. (Edited: why they liked it that much? I don't get it.)

Where are my personal favourite albums?

## [1] They are too obscure to be shown here.

OK I faked. But only a couple of them and they don't rank high.

So top 500. Enjoy.

Updated: someone criticized me because the list didn't (and still doesn't) include blabla band's blabla album. i think I've already explained this list was generated based on MA users' reviews? The results are perhaps biased, but they don't represent my own taste. Can't you see my favorite albums ain't on the list either? And can't you see how scarce the reviews are on the site? Instead of blaming it on my "useless statistics" I think it's better to log yourself in on MA and write as many reviews as possible in all your free time. 🤷
Anyway, you can still use the list to check out old/famous stuff you'd possibly like but somehow missed.
Other suggestions like to categorize the list based on time and regions are under consideration and might be added later.
Updated[2]: filters added.

Updated[3]: New approach to rank the album adjusted for cohort effect (time period), which will give relatively more weight to later albums that have high ratings but comparatively fewer reviews .
Previously the unadjusted lists are predisposed in favor of albums with more reviews, which makes less sense when comparing albums widely separated in release dates, since the amount of reviews naturally accumulated over time.
The new algorithm attempts to compensate this structural influence, but to be honest the issue is all too complicated, given that many factors such as the growth of MA users, the increase in marketing hype by some labels, or the decline of interests in irrelevant (old) releases might also have an impact on the number of reviewers sharing their idea.
Which way will be better? Who knows. Perhaps I should not be so serious because MA reviews are criminally arbitrary......
Also some other small changes that are not worth explaining.

Click here for the list dedicated to black metal albums.

  • Glossary 

    Rating Min and Max: the lowest rating and the highest rating.
    Rating Mean: the average of all the ratings.
    Rating Sd: the standard deviation of the ratings, a measure of how variable the ratings are.

  • Region:

    Year:

    Reset: